India the big loser in the US-Iran War

[The embarked 31st US Marine Expeditionary Brigade on ships nearing the Persian Gulf]

As predicted in my March 10 post — “America preparing to cut and run from Iran“, the US is in fact getting the hell out of the Gulf War. This prediction required no talent for prophesy, just a scan of America’s war record of the last 50 years! 2-3 weeks is what US President Trump is giving himself to wrap things up and call it a day. Because, he claims, he has won the war, “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear capability, installed a new regime in Tehran. Really, no. The world has wisened up to Trump’s foreign policy by bluff, bullying, lies, exaggeration and hyperbole. The American consumer staring at $4 a gallon fuel is the domestic political reason why the US is upping stakes and vamoosing. It proves my point that Americans have no stomach for war, especially when remote fighting — push a button from an aircraft at 20,000 feet here, destroy a target hundreds of miles away there, is insufficient and the situation calls for transitioning to “boots on the ground”. That means bodybags and the political end of the US President of the day! So, Trump says Bye! Bye! to the Gulf leaving UAE and Riyadh pleading for the US to finish the job of replacing the Ayatollahcracy with a more amenable regime. No go, Abdul!

Trump, moreover, with his unique talent for making enemies of close friends, alienated the Gulf states by not providing them with an impenetrable air defence cover that was promised, and the next thing they knew was everybody running for shelter as Iranian missiles slammed arbitrarily into their military bases with American presence and into skyscrapers making the Dubai, Doha and Qatar skylines a liability for the emirs and sheikhs who saw their tall buildings fall, high-flying international residents flee, businesses consider re-location, and the reputations particularly of UAE and Saudi Arabia as safe havens for fun & investment, crater.

Even as the Pasdaran (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) counter-attacked, Trump crowed that the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed Salman, would have to “kiss my ass” for help, saying this at a meeting in his Florida White House at Mar-a-lago of Saudi and UAE Sovereign Fund managers who Trump expects will invest billions of dollars in the US and save his political skin! Such crassness from Trump is par for the course because he publicly talked of American bombs raining down on Iran as “beating the shit out of” it! But it will cost America. Salman is no fool and will not take this public insult sitting down. The Saudi and UAE wealth is unlikely to be invested in America.

The European NATO allies who mock Trump as an arriviste and can barely keep the contempt they feel for him under check, refused to enter the war as demanded by him by deploying naval escorts for tankers plying the Strait of Hormuz, and went further. The Leftist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez closed Spain’s airspace to US Air Force planes flying to the Gulf theatre, an action quickly replicated by the Giorgia Meloni regime in Italy and by President Macron of France, who earlier had damned US air strikes against Iran as “unilateral”. Poland then followed by refusing to send one of its Patriot air defence systems to the Gulf as requested by Washington. The Starmer government in the UK did not say no to Trump but is making haste so slowly that by the time the Royal Navy aircraft carrier finally reaches the Gulf the operational need for it will have evaporated — Whitehall’s point! Trump reacted with a post on Truth Social: “build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT. You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!” Unlike the US President, the European leaders are no idiots, and the “just take it” approach of colonial times will be hard to sustain.

To compound the frustrating situation for the US, the Houthis fired a missile at an American target, promising more fully to get into action. So Trump is looking at a two-punch economic disaster looming for the American and the world economies: the two most critical energy seaways are getting shut down — the Hormuz Strait by Iran, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait (and the Red Sea-Suez route) by the Houthis. And to crown the developments, the US military suffered major hardware losses yesterday – Iranian drone hits blew up an American E-3 AWACS (airborne warning and control system) and several KC-135 refuellers, when these large aircraft were being readied for sorties at the Prince Sultan Base in Saudi Arabia. This is not to mention an alleged Iranian missile strike against the most advanced US aircraft carrier, USS Gerald Ford, anchored off Israel in the Mediterranean, which compelled its removal from the theatre. The rapid expenditure of munitions by its forces has denuded the American inventory so much the US Indo-Pacific commander has warned there’s not much left to fight China with should Xi invade Taiwan at this time!

The biggest winner of the Iran War unsurprisingly is Iran. With its military infrastructure quite literally reduced to powder and pulp with some 13,000 military facilities and installations destroyed by ceaseless US and Israeli bombing, the Islamic Guards still manage — a month into the war, to fire guided munitions to unsettle the US and its camp followers in the Gulf, laughing off Trumps’ threats to take out de-salination plants and civilian power stations, because they have over 417 de-salination plants that have greened desert spots in the Gulf states in their crosshairs. Reducing them to dust would return the emirates, sultanates and sheikhdoms to their original state — local fishing boat berths and caravan serais of yore, a prospect to chill the hearts of these desert rulers (who, of course, will betake themselves with their hundreds of billions of $, to Switzerland!).

Iran, moreover, has lost nothing that it prizes most. Nearly 600 tons of 60% enriched uranium are in tact, stored in an underground complex in Isfahan, geographically almost at the centre of the country, rendering any attempt by US and Israeli Special Forces to capture it, and cart it out of Iran, all but impossible. This vast amount of enriched uranium can, at a pinch, be turned into countless small radiation diffusion devices or “dirty atom bombs”, and are stored in bins deep underground that the Pasdaran guard more zealously than almost anything else in Iran. And further, Iran’s stocks of missiles and drones, and of grain, are being constantly replenished by Russia and China through the Caspian Sea route immune to American interdiction, with Moscow also feeding Tehran’s military with satellite-derived target coordinates and over-the-horizon terminal guidance for its weapons. And with Iran asserting its rights over Hormuz, every ship permitted safe passage through the Strait has to pay a $2 million fee — a small time revenue stream compared to Iran’s shipping its own oil unhindered from Kharg island to the world!

Most astonishing, however, is the grit and the spirit shown by the Irani people, not all of them supporters of Khamanei’s theocratic state. But they have firmed up, patriotically backing it in fighting off the Americans and Israelis. They are suffering enormous privation — food and electricity shortages, and are under terrific social strain but not buckling. There’s no people’s movement to replace the rule by shia clerics that Washington had fervently hoped would materialise once the first US bombs hit home. And, as a bonus, the Global South seems to be slowly but definitely coming around to supporting a besieged Iran.

The biggest loser of this war is India. Not because it got involved in any way, but because it did not, satisfying itself with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his foreign minister S Jaishankar spewing banalities. And then screwing up in the one diplomatic foray it embarked on at the UN. Instead of abstaining on both the Russian Resolution in the Security Council that sought an immediate unconditional cessation of hostilities by all sides — a reasonable objective to push, and on the Bahraini Resolution blaming Tehran for reacting to the Gulf states-aided US-Israeli attacks on Iran by striking at them, Delhi chose to co-sponsor the latter Resolution, putting India squarely in the Arab-Western camp. As a consequence, India’s problems may have just begun.

Sure, Modi wants to preserve his relationship with UAE and Saudi Arabia — the foundation for his Gulf policy — arguably the only successful prong of Indian foreign policy in the last decade. Indian labourers in the Gulf send back remittances amounting to almost $50 billion in the first quarter of 2026 — some 40% of the inward remittances totaling $138 billion (with UAE accounting for some 20% of it and Saudi Arabia 7%). It is a nice little hard currency cushion the Modi regime has over the years wasted on useless armament purchases, featuring such things as the dated Rafale fighter aircraft for the IAF and the navy! It also wants to protect the relationship with Israel — the source of advanced military technology. All this is understandable.

But there’s a lot of space between protecting Indian interests in the Gulf and Israel, and protecting the national interest vis a vis the US. Or, have Modi and Jaishankar missed out on the basic thrust of the American policy clearly and publicly articulated in Delhi recently by visiting senior Trump Administration officials?

We had Christopher Landau, US Deputy Secretary of State, bury the Modi regime’s flawed assumption that America would do for India what it had previously done for Dengist China — assist it to rise to great economic and military power. At the Raisina Dialogue 2026 — MEA’s annual poster event, Landau said no, that won’t happen because Washington had learned its lesson, and would not be a party to its own further diminution by setting up yet another economic competitor and rival. It left the Modi dispensation reeling — the main prop of its US policy kicked from underneath it by the Americans!

Next, Landau’s colleague at the Pentagon, US Under “Secretary of War” Eldridge Colby, son of a storied former US Central Intelligence Agency chief, William Colby, fetched up and formally aired, what I call, America’s compartmentalised strategy for India at the Delhi branch of an American thinktank. Washington will strive, he said in effect, to keep India down, preferably under its thumb, economically and in the technology sphere, prop up Pakistan as its main agent in the region, but will expect Delhi to help the US counterpoise China in the Indo-Pacific! Colby and Washington calculate that the Indian government is sufficiently spooked by the China threat to want to rely on the US strategically and to do so on American terms. And sure India should arm itself with American weapons, and reproduce any US military goods it wants but under license, thus lighting fire to the atmnirbharta pyre.

So far India has played America’s poodle without demur. It has adjusted its energy policy as per US directives, turning off and on the Russian oil spigot. Currently, this tap is open because as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the Press, America has “permitted” India to resume buying oil from Russia to stabilise the supply end of the International energy market. Private players, like Reliance, are careful not to tread on US toes, and simply follow the Modi regime’s lead. This is now a business incentive for Reliance because it has committed to buying $300 billion worth of oil from a new refinery being constructed in Texas, in other words it is subsidising that refinery’s construction — a deal Trump has hailed as a new era of Indo-US cooperative relationship.

But, sorry, all this Indian money and Delhi’s willingness to accommodate American interests will only buy India license-production deals for stuff like the GE 414 jet engine, not its source code! Nor will it buy Delhi consideration in the Trump tariffs scheme — India will continue paying 15%-18% tariffs on its exports to the US, lower than the 50% rate imposed earlier only because the US Supreme Court ruled such tariffs illegal. In short, India will get absolutely no US concession on anything.

Meanwhile, “Field Marshal” Asim Munir and Pakistan are making merry on the American penny. Islamabad parlayed a diplomatic arrangement by which, with the closure in 1979, of Iran’s embassy in Washington, Pakistan was looking after that country’s interests in the US, into a mediator role in the ongoing War in the Gulf. It is playing the role of a communications channel it last played when Henry Kissinger was courting China in the early 1970s and often used official Pakistan visits to detour secretly to Beijing to confer with Maozedong and Zhouenlai to facilitate US President Richard Nixon’s great rapprochement and “opening to China”. And Pentagon has resumed arms assistance to Islamabad. And on the other side, Tehran has given blanket permission for all Pakistani oil bearing ships to negotiate the Hormuz narrows, even as Indian vessels are treated on a case-by-case basis, which reflects Tehran’s displeasure.

All this time, with the Gulf War spinning out of their comprehension, Modi-Jaishankar find the bilateral relations with Tehran in trouble. Modi’s basic geopolitical construct of North-South connectivity to link Indian trade to Central Asia via Chabahar in Iran and Afghanistan to rival Beijing ‘s China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, is in the doldrums. Over $500 million has been invested but its success is hostage to Washington’s intemperate Iran policy, subject to mostly its downs. In any case, it is going nowhere! The Gulf War has put IMEC (India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor) as well in deep freeze.

India’s “between and betwixt” posture in the new Gulf war, and its tendency to bow down to the US while Modi and Jaishnakar mouth inanities about the Gulf War and fixate on Pakistan, is not going down well in the Global South where, even though India is the current chair of BRICS, it is the Brazilian President, Inacio Lula, who is making waves, standing up for Third World interests, and opposing America’s war against Iran without UN authorization or even formal declaration of war. The latter epitomised by the US nuclear attack submarine torpedoing the Iranian navy frigate, Dena, returning home after the Indian navy had hosted an Iranian flotilla of three warships at its International Fleet Review in Visakhapatnam and in the Milan naval exercise. Sure, India afforded two of the Iranian ships and their crews “safe harbour”. But India had moral responsibility to see the Iranian frigates safely home, but there was not a squeak of diplomatic protest by Delhi demanding an explanation from Washington for its heinous act.

Trump and America are running away from war, and from the Gulf, not to return in any substantial way to the region for a very long time. Had the Modi regime kept its wits about it, understood the undercurrents, and kept atop the developments in the Persian Gulf, India would have had a strategic role in shaping and influencing that region post-US. In the event, neither America nor Iran cares for India and its regional interests, and UAE and the Saudis know the Indian remittance economy survives at their sufferance and they can control Delhi. India is really up a creek, and the Modi government seems not even to be aware of the deep waters it is treading.

At the core the issue is of India being strung out between strategic subservience to the US — that has led to its Gulf policy ending in a cul de sac, and economic dependence on China, with both Washington and Beijing now hanging Modi-Jaishankar and India out to dry.

Unknown's avatar

About Bharat Karnad

Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, he was Member of the (1st) National Security Advisory Board and the Nuclear Doctrine-drafting Group, and author, among other books of, 'Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy', 'India's Nuclear Policy' and most recently, 'Why India is Not a Great Power (Yet)'. Educated at the University of California (undergrad and grad), he was Visiting Scholar at Princeton University, University of Pennsylvania, the Shanghai Institutes of International Studies, and Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan, arms exports, asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific, Asian geopolitics, Bhutan, Brazil, Central Asia, China, China military, civil-military relations, Culture, Decision-making, Defence Industry, Defence procurement, DRDO, Europe, Geopolitics, geopolitics/geostrategy, Great Power imperatives, India's China Policy, India's strategic thinking and policy, Indian Air Force, Indian Army, Indian ecobomic situation, Indian Navy, Indian Ocean, indian policy -- Israel, indian policy -- Israel, Iran and West Asia, Indo-Pacific, Intelligence, Iran and West Asia, Islamic countries, Israel, MEA/foreign policy, Military Acquisitions, Military/military advice, Missiles, Pakistan, Pakistan military, Relations with Russia, Russia, russian assistance, russian military, satellites, society, South Asia, space & cyber, Special Forces, Sri Lanka, Strategic Relations with the US & West, Taiwan, Technology transfer, technology, self-reliance, Terrorism, Trade with China, UN, United States, US., war & technology, Weapons, West Asia, Western militaries and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

49 Responses to India the big loser in the US-Iran War

  1. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    do you think india is supporting afghanistan’s sovereignty? (Covertly supporting TTP).

    as someone who knows economics. If we donot have universal education and healthcare infrastructure building is of no use. So it is not actually loss. Central asian states will anyways have more trade with india simply because pakistan has no domestic demand. Playing communication channel is no success.

    we should think of building something like chinese bri after attaining at least 90 95 percent literacy rate and fixing economic inequality at home. Then the govt does not have to beg foreign countries for tech transfer and visa for indian immigrants. But this thing modi govt has made clear will not invest in primary education. So we have to wait till the next govt.

  2. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    What guarantees will iran get professor? Shouldn’t iran also understand our problems with pakistan and china. After the war ends do you think iran foreign policy will be influenced by china due to their beidou 3 satellite help?

  3. Lonestar Indian's avatar Lonestar Indian says:

    Very good summary, captures all angles.

    Is America’s strategy to keep India as its poodle, a new policy under Trump? Or was it inherited from the Obama administration? The Obama administration was very willing to accommodate India on anything – under Def Sec Ashton Carter’s pentagon, there was an India department created that people vied to be part of.

    Agreed, India continues to play 2-D chess under Trump. Stopped buying Russian oil, begged for permission to resume buying after the Iran conflict began – all signs of a country under the US thumb. Not sure co-sponsoring the UN resolution is going to earn India any gratitude.

  4. secretlyvoid39a257c0bb's avatar secretlyvoid39a257c0bb says:

    Professor, what could have india done differently given the constraints in this situation?

  5. KP's avatar KP says:

    Professor, there has been significant discussion online regarding whether India may be preparing to resume Operation Sindoor, following recent high-level security meetings held by the NSA and the Defence Minister and Prime Ministers meeting with all states Chief Ministers additionally, developments such as the temporary closure of airports in Jodhpur, Bikaner, Jaisalmer, and Adampur, along with siren testing in border areas have contributed to this speculation. Whats your perspective on this situation?

    • Look, the Indian army and government missed the opportunity to take back, say, the Haji Pir salient, as my posts at the time — go back and read them! — had suggested we do, once air dominance was achieved by May 9, 2025. That opportunity was lost because GOI and army instead accepted the Pakistani offer of ceasefire. Not sure Sindoor can be revived.

  6. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    yes it will be total war. Cyber and space fully sponsored by china.

  7. N j's avatar N j says:

    Mr. Karnad

    What are your thoughts about the soviet naval officer Andrei Martyanov who holds a some views as per below and has expressed this very openly in many of his interviews :

    • US has primitive military doctrine that they are only good at stand off long range air warfare primarily firing at civilian targets as we see this in Tehran like steel factories, universities, medicine factories..
    • US not capable and does not have experience to organizing combined arms warfare against a capable enemy like Iran who can fight back effectively
    • Iran has basically beaten Israel to a pulp and Israeli military is over rated and only good at assassination operations.
  8. KP's avatar KP says:

    The IAF has placed an order for 60 indegeniously made “Ghatak’ UCAVs which is an unmanned bomber jet somwhat similar to the B2-Spirit bomber in design, do you think that we are finally on the right path transitioning towards unmanned systems saving us billions while also delivering high risk, deep strike Atmanirbhar capability?

  9. Vikram Singh's avatar Vikram Singh says:

    Bravo! This is your best article in recent memory. Every sentence is packed with punch and hits the Truth button spot on. You and Praveen Sawhney are the only two strategic experts and commentators I respect and follow, amid a field of sycophants and flunkies.

    Quite appositely, this clueless govt, posing to be the Vishwaguru, has finally met its comeuppance.

    One point requires highlighting. The pompous and self-regarding Jaishankar not only spewed one banality after another, he mouthed a crass epithet, which was not just unbecoming of the putative top Indian diplomat but it was manifestly low-class.

    Anyone who knows anything in Delhi knows full well that it has been Jaishankar all along who has been chiefly instrumental in crafting the obsequious camp-following foreign policy that is now hanging over us like the proverbial sword of Damocles.

    Lastly, it’s time for those of consequence in India to understand that no nation in history became a Great Power by latching on the coattails of another; that said, it is very hard to divest Indians of the creeper mentality and make them stand on their own two feet.

  10. Amandeep Singh's avatar Amandeep Singh says:

    It is just despicable what this country and its people have become.

    A PM who can’t utter a single word of protest to the US or even Israel when its own invited guests are slaughtered right outside his home.

    But how much can we blame the “elected” leader? We elected him. I remember a paragraph from one of your talks (or book) where a Paki official remarked to you “Aap Buzdil kom hain”. Right on the mark.

    This country’s people can only worry for “LPG” and their own stomach, not for any cause. The will treat treaties like it is an oath of blood while the world openly disregards them. India really is the mentally challenged kid in the block, a laughing stock of the world. A country destroyed by its own political apparatus. Sold to the highest bidder. Are we really any different today from the olden days of British Raj, or even the Delhi Sultanate.

    Even the congress with all its anti-national rhetoric in the last decade and a half had the guts to say the right thing – Damn the US!

    I am no Mil Strategist or even an Islamic sympathizer, but even my blood boiled at the Dena Strike. So much for “VishvaGuru”.

    • Musashi's avatar Musashi says:

      Thats what happened when we as a people don’t have the will to power or any collective goal. Democracy in a country like India will allow the lowest of the lowest kind to rise to the top

  11. KingTrump's avatar KingTrump says:

    To be honest Professor, India does not need America to contain its economy. India does a great job of doing it itself. With our inability to tackle difficult reforms like land, farm, judicial, etc. India is heading towards a low-income trap and a stagnating economy. We are not efficient like China for the US to have to contain us. We are perfectly capable of scuttling our own growth and atmanirbharta ambitions. What we are going to do with our sea of unemployed youth, God only knows. Perhaps that’s why we have now started to export our citizens abroad to Israel as coolie labor. Vishwacoolie India!

  12. Aditya Batra's avatar Aditya Batra says:

    Rome was not built in a day. It will take eons for correcting and cleaning the filth in the system. You are lucky that you were able to survive till now and come out of the Congress raj in one piece. Were it not for the nationalist youth, this country would be much much worse……….

    Could things be a lot better ?? Yes

    • So, we have to wait for “eons” before India becomes genuinely independent and strategically autonomous?

      • Abc's avatar Abc says:

        That depends on cleaning the filth professor. We got universal adult franchise right in 1951 when our country was illiterate and poor. Countries like USA UK Korea first focused on economic development then their elites started giving Democratic concession to the population. That’s the reason.

  13. N j's avatar N j says:

    Mr. Karnad

    Do you still hold on to your original assessment of “no boots of ground in Iran ” ? or is this whole recent news making rounds on the social media coming about US special forces arriving in Dubai , some UK ,Australian, polish special forces sent into the region 2 weeks ago, sudden retiring of the senior leadership by Hegseth a type of “Kabuki show” before making an grand exit out of this war ?

  14. dash786's avatar dash786 says:

    If you look at the history of the world, democracy and economic growth went hand-in-hand. In USA, UK, France and Germany, enlargement of suffrage went hand-in-hand with economic growth and to a large extent caused it. So please don’t spew anti-democratic diatribe in the name of economic development.

    • Anti-democratic? Where? Unless you believe that questioning US intent and mil capability is the issue. Read again, calmly

      • dash786's avatar dash786 says:

        Sir, My response was to Mr./Ms. Abc. Somehow, I could not get the proper button to respond to that comment and it appeared as an independent comment.

        My sincere and deep apologies for the misunderstanding and pain. And I agree that being democratic at home does not justify being imperialist outside. Somehow, that been a norm in modern history.

    • Abc's avatar Abc says:

      that is what I am saying . India is the only country where enlargement of suffrage happened WITHOUT economic growth. We got political advancement without social or economic advancement. I was just saying the reason why it may take eons for us to be developed.

      • dash786's avatar dash786 says:

        Many African countries and our neighbours “delayed” democracy. I do not think they are better off than us.

    • Abc's avatar Abc says:

      when us uk France were poor they did not rank high in democracy

    • Musashi's avatar Musashi says:

      You are factually wrong. No country has become developed by being democratic. All countries became democratic once it became an economic power. Please read a book

  15. Shivam's avatar Shivam says:

    Pete fires the Army chief , probably said to Hegseth face that ground invasion with less than 200k troops, and without any allies is the dumbest idea he ever heard, but boots on ground seems a plausibility with pete in-charge.

  16. dash786's avatar dash786 says:

    Excellent article. Emperor Trump has decided to leave behind a trail of destruction as he exits the Iranian war. The position of Iran is similar to that of the USSR post-WW2- physically devastated but high on morale and effectiveness. Will the Gulf States share the fate of Eastern Europe?

    The Iran war indicates that morale and ingenuity still trump technology and financial muscle (no pun intended). The GCC is a big loser as the USA security umbrella has become a millstone around its neck with Iran literally holding it by the throat (or by its balls). The Straits of Hormuz is not only the economic but also the physical lifeline of GCC as they import more than 80 percent of their foodstuffs through it.

    India did itself a disservice by choosing a side early and making a wrong choice on that. While some establishment theorists are suggesting that India’s choice was not anti-Muslim as the GCC countries are also ranged against Iran makes little sense when we realize that Gulf monarchies have not retaliated against Iran even when it has blocked their physical and economic lifeline. The impotence of Gulf defense and the magnitude of public support in these countries for Iran can be gauged from this. Coming back to India, I feel India has enough goodwill left in Iran to mend relations if it makes course correction soon.

  17. dash786's avatar dash786 says:

    They ranked higher than almost all comtemporary countries in the early 1800s. So did USA.

  18. N j's avatar N j says:

    To start the process of mending the relations with Iran, India should IMMEDIATELY send a ship load of medicines, food as well announce grants for rebuilding of the university and school infrastructure in Iran unfairly destroyed in this war.

    this is for a start. but this is very UNLIKELY to happen and if it does it may be too late in the game at a later stage as we always are .. quite frankly the long queues on the pumps and shortage of gas is a awful sight which really shows the vulnerability of the country as well poor quality of the past and present leadership..

    Mr. Karnad has written in the past about India’s thorium reserves. India should focus on this area of energy security. China is already ahead in this game as of last year where they successfully tested a thorium reactor..

  19. Pjjain's avatar thoroughlyparadise8e329d6c5a says:

    Hello Sir,

    Yesterday, the Defence Minister commissioned INS Aridhaman (SSBN-82) along with INS Taragiri, which reminded me of your earlier blog post, “Aridhaman and Carriers.” I would be very interested in hearing your updated perspective in light of these developments.

    • Regarding INS Aridhaman, you had previously mentioned that, given its size, it could house a miniaturized reactor of around 200 MW capacity. Would this represent a significant technological leap for India in such closely guarded domain as nuclear propulsion (with acknowledged Russian assistance)? How do you see this shaping India’s capabilities going forward?
    • Additionally, you had emphasized the diminishing relevance of aircraft carriers in modern naval warfare—a view that seems to be reinforced by recent conflicts, including those involving Iran. In that context, do you believe the future of naval strategy lies more in areas such as unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) and automated fast attack craft? Should the Indian Navy consider prioritizing investments in these technologies?

    I would greatly appreciate your insights on these aspects.

  20. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    professor I have a question

    do you thinkother countries having territorial disputes with china will develop nuclear weapons? If yes, will china risk nuclear war for their sovereignty(reversing their century of humiliation).

    China had rejected US offer of G2 . So will US be forced to help the global south nations(treat with respect) like china’s BRI if china refuses US offer of dividing the world or if us does not change their foreign policy will there be hot war between us and china??

    • Have been advocating transferring to all states on China’s periphery nuclear missiles, as payback for Beijing arming POakistan with NWs.
      GOI, as usual, is going half-cocked with conventional Brahmos

      • Abc's avatar Abc says:

        payback is one thing. But will it make china accept macmohan line?

      • No. But our forward units should be primed to do what PLA does — stealthily push the LAC adversary-ward as I have been advocating for years, rather than standing defensively on the line.

  21. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    professor what is your opinion of bioweapons. If Indian Army is scared of PLA should we try to infiltrate it in their western theater command?

  22. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    Another question, is jaishankar a US agent? Why do you think he is pro usa despite us making it clear publicly it won’t give what we want. What is his strategy? Is he economically or technologically illiterate?

  23. Abc's avatar Abc says:

    another question

    why do you think china has helped russia economically after ukraine war. According to me russia is also a great power and have their own goals in this world and cannot be pressured by any country. Are china russia relations friendly or transcational or just mind your own business?

Leave a reply to Shivam Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.