Craven Indian govt will bow down to Trump’s edict on Iran

Image result for pics of iran president

(Modi and Iran President Hassan Rouhani during the latter’s India visit)

Finance Ministry mandarins have been wringing their hands for a while, wondering just  how to carry on doing business with Tehran in case US President Trump nixed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), aka, nuclear deal with Iran, without getting targeted by America. That shoe has now dropped. Trump did it, he said, because he didn’t care for its “sunset provisions” that would leave Iran “on the verge of a nuclear breakout” and to avoid a “nuclear arms race in the Middle East” and economic sanctions are back on again. The Trump Administration expects that dealing harshly with Iran will also signal to the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, whom Trump is scheduled to meet soon, that playing hardball will cost him and his country plenty. Except, unlike Tehran, Pyongyang already has proven thermonuclear weapons and ICBMs to reduce any US city to irradiated ashes, and  that’s a different game altogether where Messrs Trump & Bolton have less play than they assume they have.

But arms races are not scary. Have argued (in my Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security) that nuclear arms racing isn’t all bad and is, in fact, a kind of arms control. Whatever enthusiasm the countries initially start out with soon peters out once the concerned governments come to grip with the outlays demanded by limitless racing, at which point the situation stabilizes. Trump’s trashing the JCPOA may only hasten the initiation of this racing cycle between Israel and Iran.

Except, the European signatories of this deal and close US allies — UK, France and Germany, with China and Russia backing it, fear the costs of the US sanctions on their ongoing economic and trade relations with Iran, and how these would have to be terminated lest their own companies and official agencies come within the American sanctions penumbra. So they have long expressed their aversion to the ditching of this agreement because they point to its preamble wherein Tehran promised to remain non-nuclear even after the formal duration of the deal. Of course, trying to thwart the Trump move, the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani threatened “vigorously” to pursue weaponization. It didn’t work.

America’s friends are unhappy because they will now be forced to choose between Washington and Tehran. It is clear that Trump, advised by John Bolton, his NSA, who sees in this action a means of imposing regime change, didn’t care about US allies’ pleas to cease and desist. Because he is convinced that the deal cannot stand once US sanctions are rolled out. And that the Joint Statement issued by Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, and Theresa May as reaction stating that “Our governments remain committed to ensuring the agreement is upheld, and will work with all the remaining parties to the deal to ensure this remains the case, including through ensuring the continuing economic benefits to the Iranian people that are linked to the agreement” means nothing.

Rouhani is a moderate hemmed in on the one side by the ‘Pas Daran’ (Revolutionary Guard)-led nationalist group including the militant shia clergy, the conservative population in the rural areas, and is supported by the “bazaari” (small shop owners and traders) interests, who incidentally, crucially provided the financial muscle for the ayotollahcracy in that country, and on the other side by the large and disaffected youth, the middle class, and the intelligentsia who chafe under the restrictive Islamic regime and crave normalization.

The prospects of  the Iran deal staying depends on UK, France and Germany parting ways with the US. This doesn’t seem likely. Once all is said and done they will pay the price of the disrupted economic ties and crawl back into America’s corner. So the Modi government’s hope that India will be able to ride out the sanctions storm by siding with the Brit-French-German combine and doing what they do, won’t work.

That leaves Delhi to consider what Russia and China will do. Russia is already under US sanctions and now finds in Iran a fellow victim with which it can do business to their mutual benefit. One can expect, for instance, that Tehran will begin seriously to buy the most advanced warfighting paraphernalia that will make any serious military threat by Washington difficult to carry out, so Bolton’s option of kicking out the mullahcracy system goes out the window. China, like India, faces a dilemma. It can disregard the American sanctions but only because it can threaten the US with counter economic targeting if Chinese interests are hurt in this sanctions melee, and even with a trade war if Trump wants it. China has enormous economic resources and can so deploy them against America.

What does India do? With his US tilting policy that simultaneously distances India from Russia Modi has tried hard to please Trump, which so far has not prevented Trump from going all out with his moves to close the US as economic bolthole for the Indian middle class — H1B/H-4 visas and chain migration, put imposts on imported Indian steel and aluminium, and then muster the cheek to demand that India sign the remaining two “foundational accords” — CISMOA and BECA, with the former permitting the US formally to penetrate the Indian government and military’s communications net. This was opposed by the Indian armed services but per news reports these accords are on track to be approved by Modi. Other than pushing the old F-16 aircraft for IAF use, Trump has thrown another crumb — sale of Predator drone!

The fact is the fickle US hasn’t responded to Modi’s overtures, and Russia is alienated,  so what could have been a very strong quadrilateral of India, Russia, China and Iran to neutralize the effects of the US sanctions, is unavailable to Delhi. Still, no harm if Modi tries to cobble together such an issue-based coalition. Japanese PM Shinzo Abe has done just such a thing by calling a meeting of Japan, China, and South Korea as, perhaps, a body to pick up the pieces after Trump is done (though the South Korean deputy foreign minister justified it as a runup to making the Jong-un-Trump summit successful).

Consider what the US sanctions are about. The Israeli paper, Haaretz of May 8 explains: “The first batch of sanctions will be …in place in August 2018 [and] include, among others, sanctions on the acquisition of U.S. dollar banknotes by Iran’s government; sanctions on Iran’s trade in gold and other precious metals; sanctions on direct or indirect sale, supply or transfer of aluminum, steel, coal and graphite to Iran; and sanctions on Iran’s automotive sector…..The second batch of sanctions will be put back in place by November 2018. These include, among others, sanctions on Iran’s shipping sector; sanctions on Iran’s petroleum exports; sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran, and broader sanctions on Iran’s energy sector.” The idea is to economically throttle Iran.

As mentioned, these sanctions would fail if US’ European allies and Russia and China stayed stuck to the JCPOA and frustrated the American sanctions regime. This won’t happen. Though, no doubt, starting tomorrow members of the US policy eco-system in Delhi headed by the Indian chapters of Brookings and Carnegie will begin churning out commentaries and analyses to show why India should stand by Trump, which line will be picked up and embroidered over the weeks by the usual op-ed writers in Indian dailies and talking heads on TV and other electronic media.

The question is this: Is India so bereft of leverage that it has no alternative? I have been pounding on this issue for long — but why doesn’t Modi manipulate access to the Indian market not just against the US  but even China to get what it wants? Trump will have to pause in his blundering ways if he is faced with restrictions on American companies operating in India. And why can’t Delhi have a meaningful exchange — the use of Indian military bases, for example, for advanced military technologies (instead of being fobbed off with predator drones and the like)? And why can’t India go back to using friendship  and intimacy with Russia to lever a more equitable relationship with America?

And this is just the opportunity, moreover, to replace the British, German, and French  companies in their the businesses in Iran, and open up that entire realm of economic possibilities by getting the versatile and capable Indian manufacturing sector to meet Iranian demands and requirements. At a more elevated level, India can be in league with Russia, China, Iran, southern and southeastern Asia, and Central Asian states to form an economic system to rival the one dominated by the US?

And, instead of despairing, Finance Ministry bureaucrats better begin exploring oil payments options routed through the Chinese renminbi or the Russian rouble channels. The promise of this alone will further steel Xi’s and Putin’s intentions to take on the US. These are the sorts of options that need fleshing out, rather than surrendering to the traditional way of conducting business the Western way. In an independent path lies India’s future. Surely, even Modi sees that giving in again and again to Washington is to erode self-respect and to strengthen the Western conviction of India as a country that can be easily pushed around. That’s the reputation Modi’s India is developing. Time we sloughed it off. India is nobody’s plaything, or is it?

Perhaps, Modi should bear in mind the primary lesson of Trump’s disowning the nuclear deal with Iran. It is that the United States is an unreliable partner and that, for very good reasons, India would be well advised to maintain a certain distance with the US and not sign any meaningful accords with it. Becoming too chummy with America can be a liability — never know when it will be thrown under the bus. And Washington can disavow any agreement signed in good faith at any time. Remember Tarapur?

About Bharat Karnad

Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, he was Member of the (1st) National Security Advisory Board and the Nuclear Doctrine-drafting Group, and author, among other books of, 'Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy', 'India's Nuclear Policy' and most recently, 'Why India is Not a Great Power (Yet)'. Educated at the University of California (undergrad and grad), he was Visiting Scholar at Princeton University, University of Pennsylvania, the Shanghai Institutes of International Studies, and Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC.
This entry was posted in asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific, Asian geopolitics, Central Asia, China, Culture, Decision-making, disarmament, Europe, Geopolitics, Great Power imperatives, India's China Policy, India's Pakistan Policy, India's strategic thinking and policy, Iran and West Asia, MEA/foreign policy, Military/military advice, nonproliferation, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Pakistan, Pakistan military, Relations with Russia, Russia, russian assistance, russian military, South Asia, Strategic Relations with the US & West, United States, US., Weapons, West Asia, Western militaries. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Craven Indian govt will bow down to Trump’s edict on Iran

  1. Vishnugupt says:

    No sane Indian politician would ever side with any sort of policy decisions which might help push Brent Crude prices up.
    Looming sanctions on Iran from the past 6 months have already pushed crude beyond 75$ and judging by the current trajectory of crude, it will definitely breach the 100$ mark by year end.

    This is a very serious issue for Modi,since it will leave no elbow room for him in the penultimate year of his tenure to be populist and secure a second term. And will leave him seriously constrained if he wins a second term as well.So i think we can be pretty sure that he is already working a way around this.

    Anyways the US has just “one carrot” in its basket which it can offer Delhi to convince it to stand on its side and i think Predator drones don’t even qualify as peanuts when pitted against the prospects of a second term for Modi.The only way out for Trump perhaps is to offer Shale gas for half the price to India.

    It is clear as day for those who see that Trump’s transnational policies are aimed to pump up crude prices and dethrone OPEC and reinstate Exon & BP’s lost glory as the undisputed mafias of the oil industry.
    Tillerson may be out but the lobby which put him there is getting what they wanted from Trump.It is not surprising that the US has expanded its oil output and walked out of Paris deal.

    Coming to issue of not standing up to the H1-B and other visa issue, i think one shouldn’t it “personally” and take a objective look at it,clearly the 0.0001% “middle class” IIT+IIM,AIIMS educated India’s isn’t exactly a vulnerable section of the society.

    And when it comes to rich and influential Indians wanting to “settle their wards abroad” they have no issues since EB-5 Visa is working fine as earlier. So clearly there are no drivers in this direction.
    But surely India will loose a few Billions and slip down in the foreign remittance chart in the short run, but i believe we won’t regret it in the long run.

    Raising the salary cap for H1-B will only help stop the indiscriminate brain drain and further Modi’s ‘Make in India’, since top IITians will no longer be able to pursue their “american dream” and would leave them with no option but to consider working for 5 digit salary offered by DRDO,ISRO,BARC,HAL or Indian corporates either way i think it will do us only good.

    If i remember correctly, you yourself have made a case for stopping brain drain to China of talented Indians which might have strategic implications for India.(Thats particular piece was about an Indian engineer developing quantum computing capacity for PLA)

  2. vivek says:

    first India doesn’t have good options to go against US like china has. Second Modi wants to win next election(even if its cost country’s sovereignty) , making US angry may fade his chance to win 🙂

    • &^%$#@! says:

      IIMHO it is true that NM would mortgage his own country’s sovereignty just to get a second term (which is virtually assured without ,compromising his country’s sovereignty, for lack of any alternative) However being an uneducated boor, he has obviously never heard of the old adage: “Be careful what you wish for, it might just come true” .

  3. ~!@#$%^&*()_+ says:

    Re. – “Time we sloughed it off. India is nobody’s palything, or is it?”

    India is nobody’s plaything. What Modi and his corner does can be ignored.

    There is a limit to how much PRISM can manipulate polity in India to the benefit of the Indian strategic community. There are bigger storms brewing where no amount of intelligence can help matters.

    Then there is an equally larger question as to what India can do for Asia, in the current moment, to be able to demand something in return (today or tomorrow). India is stuck with the current strategic community and in the corridors of power, the definition of Asia is limited to India, Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia (a rump Asia). Asians deserve an economic-strategic life of their own and Chinese drive and Russian tech can help Asia in no small measures. India may not be an active part of this consolidation of Asia but our strength is only going to increase in future. May be in future we also get the chance to re-shape Asia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.