As anticipated in previous blog, the K-4 SLBM was successfully test-fired from an underwater pontoon off Vizag on Monday, March 7. The govt/DRDO have still to inform the media/press about it. The logic behind such rationing of publicity, however, escapes me. Sure, a failed launch is best kept under wraps. But the success of what is a decisive nuclear warhead delivery system from submerged platform is something that needs to be crowed about a bit, just so everybody knows. May be GOI/DRDO will later, if not sooner, get to this task.
Search
Categories
- Afghanistan (160)
- Africa (57)
- arms exports (308)
- asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific (255)
- Asian geopolitics (765)
- Australia (69)
- Bangladesh (51)
- Bhutan (52)
- Brazil (5)
- Central Asia (172)
- China (503)
- China military (444)
- civil-military relations (415)
- corruption (92)
- Culture (341)
- Cyber & Space (73)
- Decision-making (331)
- Defence Industry (369)
- Defence procurement (17)
- disarmament (74)
- domestic politics (327)
- DRDO (286)
- Europe (359)
- Geopolitics (692)
- geopolitics/geostrategy (47)
- Great Power imperatives (718)
- guerilla warfare (90)
- India's China Policy (458)
- India's Pakistan Policy (363)
- India's strategic thinking and policy (719)
- Indian Air Force (457)
- Indian Army (458)
- Indian democracy (195)
- Indian ecobomic situation (362)
- Indian Navy (397)
- Indian Ocean (260)
- Indian para-military forces (50)
- indian policy — Israel (33)
- indian policy — Israel, Iran and West Asia (131)
- Indian Politics (397)
- Indian state/administration (4)
- Indo-Pacific (6)
- Intelligence (62)
- Internal Security (225)
- Iran and West Asia (115)
- Islamic countries (18)
- Israel (51)
- Japan (122)
- Latin America (23)
- Maldives (48)
- MEA/foreign policy (282)
- Military Acquisitions (412)
- Military/military advice (284)
- Missiles (245)
- Myanmar (39)
- Nepal (23)
- nonproliferation (132)
- North Korea (31)
- Northeast Asia (123)
- NRIs (19)
- nuclear industry (65)
- Nuclear Policy & Strategy (301)
- nuclear power (52)
- Nuclear Weapons (292)
- Pakistan (401)
- Pakistan military (335)
- Pakistan nuclear forces (95)
- Relations with Russia (173)
- Russia (296)
- russian assistance (189)
- russian military (123)
- SAARC (227)
- satellites (29)
- society (523)
- South Asia (748)
- South East Asia (182)
- space & cyber (21)
- Special Forces (85)
- Sri Lanka (47)
- Strategic Forces Command (123)
- Strategic Relations with South East Asia & Far East (199)
- Strategic Relations with the US & West (444)
- Taiwan (24)
- Technology transfer (278)
- technology, self-reliance (11)
- Terrorism (191)
- Tibet (102)
- UN (66)
- United States (488)
- US. (484)
- Vietnam (106)
- Weapons (450)
- West Asia (125)
- Western militaries (181)
Subscribe via RSS
Archives
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (6)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (10)
- May 2020 (7)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (6)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (6)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (8)
- May 2019 (10)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (9)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (10)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (12)
- August 2018 (9)
- July 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (7)
- May 2018 (8)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (6)
- November 2017 (6)
- October 2017 (6)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (8)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (8)
- January 2017 (9)
- December 2016 (12)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (11)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (15)
- July 2016 (13)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (9)
- April 2016 (19)
- March 2016 (11)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (19)
- December 2015 (10)
- November 2015 (24)
- October 2015 (11)
- September 2015 (8)
- August 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (11)
- April 2015 (11)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (7)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (6)
- June 2014 (9)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (7)
- January 2014 (10)
- December 2013 (8)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (13)
- August 2013 (17)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (11)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (6)
- February 2013 (10)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (6)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (5)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (12)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (28)
- September 2011 (2)
Bharat Sir,
Are you sure the test was successful ? There are articles in the New Indian Express about the test having taken place but the same said that the outcme was unknown. Also, was it the K-4 tested? Somebody posted on an online forum that the NOTAM indicated a 700 km range test or so…
K-4 was tested at least 2 times secretly in 2010, 2011 according to Sandeep Unnithan of India Today, though the world media had no cognizance about the testing. Then in 2014 it was tested 2 times, one on March 24 and the other on May 14. Since then it has started coming out of the closet. The NOTAM you indicated is about K-15 missile. My assumption is that through the NOTAM for a 750 km missile, DRDO wanted to keep the K-4 testing under wraps just it did so many times by repeatedly testing Prithvi Missile. And now after the secret testing of the missiles successfully a number of times, DRDO is leaking the info of the missile to the media. The objective of the test is to gauge the full operational range of the missile up to 3500 km with a mammoth 2-ton warhead.
A 2 ton warhead would make the range very low indeed. The range vs payload equation goes into detail, given the current state of Bharti rocketry, unless DRDO adopts composities and better propellants than what it is currently using that isn’t possible.
Just wait for the K-5, that is the canistered SLBM version of the Agni 5 that will answer all your hope and dreams. 8000km with 1 ton payload is pretty good no matter how you slice it.
The best I know is that it was K-4.
Bharat Sir,
Maybe they tested the K-4 to a limited range, then. After all, even China tests its ICBMs at reduced ranges inland most of the time: from Taiyuan to Lop Nur (about 2000 km). This even for the DF-41/DF-5B which have a 12000 km maximum range. So, a limited range test of the K-4 is plausible.
May be media was informed but they ignored it. A missile test is usually notified. is it not?.
Well there are other secrets as well ……
HAL Tejas really impressed the crowd at Bahrain…… we did not hear much
LCH broke a world record by landing at SIACHIN, it is claimed to be the first Heli to land at such height with decent payload….. Another secret?.
May be media is looking for another “UN-NAMED IAF Officer” to make a claim that missile did not work …..hehe and is yet to find one, Since this is about the Navy. and they usually are all named (unlike IAF and media Navy does not have Capt. Nemo, at least it appears like that) and does not run to media with news, of success or failure.