Brought to my notice and it caused a shudder when I realized a mistake that shouldn’t have been made — deadline pressure, no excuses, I apologize — but the Russian Shkval weapon mentioned in the previous post (first published in ‘The Citizen’) is a torpedo, of course. A unique torpedo that I have mentioned in writings going back awhile, Shkval is able to attain extraordinary underwater speeds (what to speak of the variant promised India that will be out-of-water and reach hypersonic velocity in getting to the target) because it travels in an air bubble meeting no water resistance whatsoever. In fact, this technology only with, and perfected, by Russia is motivating Russian-trained Chinese submarine designers in their efforts to design a submarine able to ride a similar vacuum bubble. What China sets it mind on getting military technology and hardware-wise, it gets. That’s another headache down the road for India to deal with.
Search
Categories
- Afghanistan (178)
- Africa (64)
- arms exports (342)
- asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific (313)
- Asian geopolitics (822)
- Australia (81)
- Bangladesh (58)
- Bhutan (57)
- Brazil (9)
- Central Asia (191)
- China (551)
- China military (488)
- civil-military relations (452)
- corruption (103)
- Culture (392)
- Cyber & Space (83)
- Decision-making (391)
- Defence Industry (394)
- Defence procurement (45)
- disarmament (76)
- domestic politics (345)
- DRDO (305)
- Europe (394)
- Geopolitics (747)
- geopolitics/geostrategy (102)
- Great Power imperatives (771)
- guerilla warfare (97)
- India's China Policy (504)
- India's Pakistan Policy (393)
- India's strategic thinking and policy (773)
- Indian Air Force (494)
- Indian Army (503)
- Indian democracy (210)
- Indian ecobomic situation (389)
- Indian Navy (427)
- Indian Ocean (277)
- Indian para-military forces (56)
- indian policy — Israel (34)
- indian policy — Israel, Iran and West Asia (135)
- Indian Politics (413)
- Indian state/administration (14)
- Indo-Pacific (55)
- Intelligence (77)
- Internal Security (238)
- Iran and West Asia (124)
- Islamic countries (31)
- Israel (52)
- Japan (137)
- Latin America (26)
- Maldives (53)
- MEA/foreign policy (330)
- Military Acquisitions (445)
- Military/military advice (330)
- Missiles (268)
- Myanmar (40)
- Nepal (26)
- nonproliferation (138)
- North Korea (37)
- Northeast Asia (138)
- NRIs (20)
- nuclear industry (70)
- Nuclear Policy & Strategy (313)
- nuclear power (56)
- Nuclear Weapons (306)
- Pakistan (437)
- Pakistan military (371)
- Pakistan nuclear forces (102)
- Relations with Russia (195)
- Russia (327)
- russian assistance (207)
- russian military (144)
- SAARC (252)
- sanctions (6)
- satellites (34)
- society (575)
- South Asia (806)
- South East Asia (196)
- space & cyber (31)
- Special Forces (97)
- Sri Lanka (57)
- Strategic Forces Command (133)
- Strategic Relations with South East Asia & Far East (211)
- Strategic Relations with the US & West (476)
- Taiwan (31)
- Technology transfer (294)
- technology, self-reliance (31)
- Terrorism (207)
- Tibet (117)
- Trade with China (4)
- UN (74)
- United States (536)
- US. (532)
- Vietnam (115)
- Weapons (491)
- West Asia (136)
- Western militaries (201)
Subscribe via RSS
Archives
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (5)
- March 2022 (10)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (6)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (10)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (6)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (10)
- May 2020 (7)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (6)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (6)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (8)
- May 2019 (10)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (9)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (10)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (12)
- August 2018 (9)
- July 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (7)
- May 2018 (8)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (6)
- November 2017 (6)
- October 2017 (6)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (8)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (8)
- January 2017 (9)
- December 2016 (12)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (11)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (15)
- July 2016 (13)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (9)
- April 2016 (19)
- March 2016 (11)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (19)
- December 2015 (10)
- November 2015 (24)
- October 2015 (11)
- September 2015 (8)
- August 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (11)
- April 2015 (11)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (7)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (6)
- June 2014 (9)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (7)
- January 2014 (10)
- December 2013 (8)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (13)
- August 2013 (17)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (11)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (6)
- February 2013 (10)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (6)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (5)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (12)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (28)
- September 2011 (2)
I for one do not believe that the Russians gave the Chines the technology to build a submarine using the principles of the Shkval, assuming that they (the Russians) have developed such a technology in the first place. I have reasonably good knowledge of both systems on which I make this assertion. It is rumored that China has procured the Shkval. OTOH, there are far more credible reports that hint that so has the IN. In fact, Iran’s Hoot torpedo is either a reverse engineered Shkval, or the real McCoy itself. There’s a huge difference between the Shkval and a submarine using the principles of supercavitation. First is the size. Next is the nature of the directed exhaust which in conjunction with its uniquely designed nose allows the Shkval to attain its incredible performance.
There are some stories in tabloids of an ultra-fast Chinese submarine. But that can be taken with a “pinch of salt”. OTOH, one cannot discount the fact that the Chinese have great Centres of Excellence in Naval Design (the Shanghai Jia Tong University being just one among many). OTOH, the Indian academic system is pathetic! The students lack even the most basic mathematical skills one can expect from a Bachelors degree holder in Engineering and the hard sciences. They are lazy and dishonest workers, who prefer taking a few Coursera courses and calling themselves “data scientists”, and getting a large pay packet somewhere.
If they are sacked, the market is so large, they will be back in business very fast (in fact, in a matter of days). From my observations, Chinese students in the hard sciences and engineering seek a career. Many of them keep studying and never stop even 25 years after their Ph.D.’s. OTOH Indians treat science and engineering as a job and not a career. They cannot be corrected because it hurts their “tender” feelings, and they need to be complimented and paid for their incompetence and laziness. Those few that hack it out in the West doing pure science and engineering are exceptions to the rule. The Nadela’s, etc.. who are held up as stellar examples of Indian scientific “brilliance” are merely managers.
Could absence of inspiring and motivational teachers at all levels also be a reason?
I have noticed a few things that stand out. First, Chinese have a sense of National ethos that is built around hard work. Indians have no such thing. Next, Chinese are meticulous in their documentation. OTOH, Indians are tardy at documentation, and at the very most put down even scientific and engineering details in some haphazard power point like manner (which is passed off as meticulous documentation). I’ve seen many Indian projects fail because the person who did it left and the documentation he/she left was either non existent or so tardy that large amounts of money were spent redoing the same task. Finally, a group meeting among Indians turns out to resemble a fish market squabble. Different people talking incoherently at the same time. I have rarely seen this behavior among Chinese.
Just another casualty of secularism ie public self hate for being Hindu.
Re. – “hypersonic velocity in getting to the target) because it travels in an air bubble.”
Sorry @BK but this needs to be flagged.
There are benefits of this and similar technologies. May be even for submarines. May be even in ways that are not currently expressed in literature.
But hypersonic velocity while travelling inside an air bubble is fantasy. The best till date is nowhere near this. Skin drag is not the only headache for a projectile inside a fluid.
I have read the post more than once to make sure I don’t end up attacking a sentence that is not wrong but the one that I have flagged is just not right.
@Mongrelji — Please read the full sentence from the post again — “Shkval is able to attain extraordinary underwater speeds (what to speak of the variant promised India that will be out-of-water and reach hypersonic velocity in getting to the target) because it travels in an air bubble meeting no water resistance whatsoever.” Sorry for a convoluted sentence construction. But hypersonic applies once Shkval breaks water surface for its terminal run to target, and the air bubble medium is for underwater passage at speeds in excess of 200 knots (did someone say, 280-300 knots?).
Thanks for the effort, now it makes sense.
Yes it is lucrative and most likely we will never get it from western countries, at least not without, paying with our heart and liver, in exchange.
Further considering the lousy %age of defense budget we spend on R&D (which is about half of what China was spending in 2002), we will also not be able to make something like this, without compromising on other running projects.