President Putin’s regime is obviously unwilling to cede first place as armaments supplier to India and is ready to trump any Western country with deals that can’t be beat. In the news is the story about the proposal to set up India as the major hub for upgrade, refit, and repairs of Kilo-class submarines in the inventories of states in the extended Indian Ocean region, from Iran to Vietnam. This is fine. But a still more impressive offer apparently made to India is the transfer of the improved Yasen-M class SSN — the most advanced in the Russian naval list. Russian submersibles may be beaten by their US counterparts in terms of acoustic silencing features but, in turn, cannot match, as the reputed naval analyst Norman Palomar has observed, the far smaller turbulence signature (from less cavitation noises, placement of the forward-tilting conning tower, etc) of Russian boats. Indeed, despite the vaunted ASW capabilities of the USN, a Victor-III class Russian SSN around 2000 tailed an Ohio-class SSBN almost to its pen in Guam w/o anybody getting wind of it — that’s how loud the US boomer is in turbulence terms and how little turbulence is generated by the Russian boat. Russian subs have since the Sixties carried electro-optical devices in the sail and the hull to detect turbulence and identify enemy subs by their turbulence signatures. The Yasen can be in the SSGN cruise missile-carrying configuration, or, if India so wishes, it can be modified to carry a mixed ordnance load of conventional cruise missiles and nuclear ballistic missiles. That would be a devastating dual-purpose land attack-cum-strategic targeting weapons platform non pareil to have in IN service. There’s nothing like the Yasen-class with the Chinese Navy.
Search
Categories
- Afghanistan (178)
- Africa (64)
- arms exports (342)
- asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific (313)
- Asian geopolitics (822)
- Australia (81)
- Bangladesh (58)
- Bhutan (57)
- Brazil (9)
- Central Asia (191)
- China (551)
- China military (488)
- civil-military relations (452)
- corruption (103)
- Culture (392)
- Cyber & Space (83)
- Decision-making (391)
- Defence Industry (394)
- Defence procurement (45)
- disarmament (76)
- domestic politics (345)
- DRDO (305)
- Europe (394)
- Geopolitics (747)
- geopolitics/geostrategy (102)
- Great Power imperatives (771)
- guerilla warfare (97)
- India's China Policy (504)
- India's Pakistan Policy (393)
- India's strategic thinking and policy (773)
- Indian Air Force (494)
- Indian Army (503)
- Indian democracy (210)
- Indian ecobomic situation (389)
- Indian Navy (427)
- Indian Ocean (277)
- Indian para-military forces (56)
- indian policy — Israel (34)
- indian policy — Israel, Iran and West Asia (135)
- Indian Politics (413)
- Indian state/administration (14)
- Indo-Pacific (55)
- Intelligence (77)
- Internal Security (238)
- Iran and West Asia (124)
- Islamic countries (31)
- Israel (52)
- Japan (137)
- Latin America (26)
- Maldives (53)
- MEA/foreign policy (330)
- Military Acquisitions (445)
- Military/military advice (330)
- Missiles (268)
- Myanmar (40)
- Nepal (26)
- nonproliferation (138)
- North Korea (37)
- Northeast Asia (138)
- NRIs (20)
- nuclear industry (70)
- Nuclear Policy & Strategy (313)
- nuclear power (56)
- Nuclear Weapons (306)
- Pakistan (437)
- Pakistan military (371)
- Pakistan nuclear forces (102)
- Relations with Russia (195)
- Russia (327)
- russian assistance (207)
- russian military (144)
- SAARC (252)
- sanctions (6)
- satellites (34)
- society (575)
- South Asia (806)
- South East Asia (196)
- space & cyber (31)
- Special Forces (97)
- Sri Lanka (57)
- Strategic Forces Command (133)
- Strategic Relations with South East Asia & Far East (211)
- Strategic Relations with the US & West (476)
- Taiwan (31)
- Technology transfer (294)
- technology, self-reliance (31)
- Terrorism (207)
- Tibet (117)
- Trade with China (4)
- UN (74)
- United States (536)
- US. (532)
- Vietnam (115)
- Weapons (491)
- West Asia (136)
- Western militaries (201)
Subscribe via RSS
Archives
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (5)
- March 2022 (10)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (6)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (10)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (6)
- January 2021 (6)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (8)
- August 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (10)
- May 2020 (7)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (6)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (6)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (8)
- May 2019 (10)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (9)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (10)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (12)
- August 2018 (9)
- July 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (7)
- May 2018 (8)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (6)
- November 2017 (6)
- October 2017 (6)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (8)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (8)
- January 2017 (9)
- December 2016 (12)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (11)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (15)
- July 2016 (13)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (9)
- April 2016 (19)
- March 2016 (11)
- February 2016 (11)
- January 2016 (19)
- December 2015 (10)
- November 2015 (24)
- October 2015 (11)
- September 2015 (8)
- August 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (11)
- April 2015 (11)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (7)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (6)
- June 2014 (9)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (7)
- January 2014 (10)
- December 2013 (8)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (13)
- August 2013 (17)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (11)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (6)
- February 2013 (10)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (6)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (6)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (5)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (12)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (28)
- September 2011 (2)
How come your indigenous manufacturing penchant and disaffectation with forign arms like the Rafale and FMBT , Armata et al doesn’t extend mutatis mutandis to the Yassen? Perhaps the sub will cost more than a sqn worth Rafales and with equipment and weapons as much as the entire deal worth of 36.
audacter calumniare, semper aliquid haeret. contra principia negantem non est disputandum.
dum Roma deliberat Saguntum perit. onus probandi on the IAF and IA??quid infantes sumus??
O tempora O mores!
omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina
What nonsense. Does India have anything close to the ability to build its own fleet of advanced conventional subs? Have you looked at the state of our sub fleet and what is likely to happen to it in terms of numbers? Have you looked at the rate at which PLAN is building subs and forays into the IOR. Everything has a context. Let India first start building conventional subs…..our energies are devoted to building the next Arihant now. Maybe in 10-20 years, we may be totally self sufficient in the area but we need a conventional powered sub deal to fill in the numbers.
@Shaurya & @archit — all the blog revealed was the offer of the Yasen-M class SSN. It said nothing about its production in India. Any nuclear-powered submarine is a different kettle of fish than conv armaments — and comes with far more strategic, technology, and political weightage — not a point that needs stressing, I thought. The Yasen has only just begun its production run — with the 2nd of the series, Kazan, coming on stream. India has established a relationship with leasing Russian N-subs, with the deal for the 2nd Akula — the Iribis being finalized. Perhaps, the Yasen has come packaged with the offer for the Kilo-refit, upgrade, repair depot in India to firm up a longterm relationship.
I was only replying to @archit. Agree with you that we need to procure some conventional subs. If it comes with TOT to build nothing like it.
Does no one see the double standards or hypocrisy in vehemently criticising one kind of foreign acquisition ( which we are in no position to make) and lapping up another one (again which are in no position to make) and is even more expensive? Tell the man, cruise missiles can be fired from aircraft as well, so can nukes. And there can be just so many subs as against many many aircraft. The man is biased
Bharat Sir,
I read a news item about Russia willing to sell Su-35s to Pakistan. How true is this likely to be ?
Moscow occasionally plays footsie with Pak to keep India interested. Don’t think the offer of MiG-35 is serious.
You meant Su-35 ?
Yes, sorry, Su-35.
Since when Russia has played footsie before with “Paki” you love to call, from a man of your stature? We had few transport (vintage) MI-17 helicopters. Please be honest and don’t shoot from both ends when it comes to Pakistan. Russia is changing, recent MI35 gunship deal(even 6 hellos) and $2.5B gas pipeline may be just the beginning not the end. And don’t be so obsessed with Pakistan. We are only reactive. Pakistan army is an integral part and our guardian… and we are very proud of this institution..
FYI it is India that introduced the nuclear menace in the subcontinent but you Indians cleverly lump China in this equation. Great diversion from real issue/s…
One of the primary thrusts of my writings since forever — which you may not be aware of, tho’ you can look up my numerous books — is to de-fixate Indian strategic thinking from Pakistan — a small but pesky neighbor who can be better contained by other than brandishing field armies, and that the real hard challenge is China which we better gear up to face or risk oblivion.
Sir, with so many converging interests is it possible that Russia and China becoming much closer than Russia and India . They both face same threats from western world as well as from democracies. Russia has ample amount of shale while China is also trying to to reduce it’s pollution and is enrgy hungry as always. Also China could be of great help for Russia in controlling it’s restive eastern region.
What threat is there to China from the West?
Had China felt threatened would they have decided to become the biggest creditor to the West?
And had West been really after China would they have facilitated China with MFN statuses for so long?
Had West felt threatened by China would they have countenanced China ‘steeling’ their technology?
G-2 is the real thing they are after. All else is drama.
China would love to have Russia turned into another Noko/Pakistan for itself and Obama is helping achieve just that.
http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2011/10/11-china-us-g2-bush
[quote]Now there are a couple of “germs of reality” in the Brzezinski-Bergsten G-2 idea. In the sixth month of his presidency, President Barack Obama laid out a grand vision for bilateral relations between the two countries. On the occasion of the first Strategic and Economic Dialogue, he said, “The relationship between the U.S. and China will shape the 21st century, which makes it as important as any bilateral relationship in the world…. If we advance [our mutual] interests through cooperation, our people will benefit and the world will be better off—because our ability to partner with each other is a prerequisite for progress on many of the most pressing global challenges.”[/quote]