Chandigarh Meet downloads

The Seminar organizers are having some difficulty uploading viodeo on YouTube and have given the sites below for the feeds for those interested.

Part One  http://www.adrive.com/public/ET74vh/IndiaChinaNov2012A.mpg

Part Four http://www.adrive.com/public/DYR7g7/IndiaChinaNov2012D.mpg

About Bharat Karnad

Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, he was Member of the (1st) National Security Advisory Board and the Nuclear Doctrine-drafting Group, and author, among other books of, 'Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy', 'India's Nuclear Policy' and most recently, 'Why India is Not a Great Power (Yet)'. Educated at the University of California (undergrad and grad), he was Visiting Scholar at Princeton University, University of Pennsylvania, the Shanghai Institutes of International Studies, and Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC.
This entry was posted in Asian geopolitics, China, China military, civil-military relations, Great Power imperatives, India's China Policy, India's Pakistan Policy, India's strategic thinking and policy, Indian Air Force, Indian Army, Indian Navy, Indian Politics, Internal Security, Pakistan, Pakistan military, South Asia. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Chandigarh Meet downloads

  1. Ram Singapore says:

    Thanks!

  2. Shaurya says:

    Thanks.

  3. Shaurya says:

    Bharat ji: A couple of comments. 1. Liked your idea of the ADM, it is a good defensive move that will open space for more aggressive gestures in the “Indo-China” Sea. (Aka: South China Sea).

    2. On the co-option message on Pakistan, which you have been advocation for a long time, IMO: There are serious misgivings at two levels. A. Most people do not understand “WHY?” Not just the surface reasoning but many do not truly understand geo-politics or equations of strategic power – even well read folks.

    B. The next question is more tougher for people to understand, which is “is co-option of Pakistan possible?” Meaning would they accept it? In here comes all the issues of mistress, animosities and deep communal misgivings.

    I am only touching the tip of the iceberg on the gamut of question raised on the matter of Pakistan and most do not get it, just like you experienced in the question you got from the audience.

    Urge you to publish an entire series of articles detailing a Pakistan co-option plan.

  4. Sethu says:

    Bharatji, thanks for the uploads. Second the thought expressed above on co-opting Pakistan. Would appreciate a detailed post. As always, thanks so much!

  5. I was seeking some good info relating to this, I’m delighted I ran across your posting! Carry on the good operate!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s